16 May 2024 |
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- Prince Deckow Sr. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined. No disruption since being warned. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- 186.121.194.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Ranassilks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Link spamming using AI-generated text. [1] Florificapis (talk) 15:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- 216.93.130.160 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Pink Friday 2 World Tour (diff): vandalism after final warning. May also be editing under the registered name User:SDAFJTSD. Binksternet (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Bluddotnet1234 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SmashedLyrics (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MillaExistsIHateMyself (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- EBooks2goMarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Promotional type username. Currently no edits. 80.0.166.171 (talk) 02:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- TMJRX Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) promotional / role type username. Currently no edits. 80.0.166.171 (talk) 02:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- FBiofactcheck2024 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. FlandersBio. Ligaturama (talk) 08:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- MahdiSultanartistofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – created user page advertising Bangladeshi pop musician Mahdi Sultan. 46.69.215.187 (talk) 15:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 16:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Süleyman Pasha (son of Orhan)
Reason: Sudden and stubborn influx of IPs and new accounts created with the sole purpose of vandalizing the page, removing information cited en masse, as visible from the chrono of the last two weeks circa. Subjected to repeated vandalism in these same minutes. Sira Aspera (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Maratha Confederacy
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeatedly the User:Mohammad Umar Ali edit this page. Rahio1234 11:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would request anyone who is seeing the msg that this user Rahio is harassing me and not letting me add my WP:RS sourced information in the article just because it doesn't suit his POV. I already had a long discussion on the disputed topic in Maratha Confederacy talk page and quoted the information from WP:RS sources still he is vandalizing the info and reverting my edits. Also this user has been previously blocked for adding unsourced information (WP:OR) and edit disputes. Plz help me and see to it. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please see WP:RS if necessary Rahio1234 11:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- What do you think is a reliable source? You seem to cite WP:RS every time you disagree with someone's edits, despite most of the time the edits being fine. I recently reverted your reverts on Ministry of Interior (Iraq) because an IP added good and cited content which you reverted by just saying, "see WP:RS". I don't think Mohammad Umar Ali is in the right either here, as he even has an ongoing and seemingly truthful sockpuppet investigation against him, but you can't always cite WP:RS anytime an IP edits a page or someone adds content you don't like. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 12:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- 1st source The Marathas New Cambridge history of India Vol2 Part 4 pg 138 mentions
Maratha brief occupation of Punjab see the quote: After yet another Abdali invasion, the Marathas, under Nana Saheb’s brother, Ragunath Rao, and Malhar Rao Holkar, returned from Malwa and the Deccan in the campaigning season of 1757-58. A Maratha invasion of the Punjab followed, which coincided with the much more significant Sikh rebellion. The Maratha Punjab adventure was brief; the Ragunath Rao expedition left little administration behind, and the Sikhs successfully resisted any attempt to set up long-term Maratha authority.
This clearly says Marathas briefly occupied Punjab and the exact limits can be inferred from my second source JL Mehta Advance study in History of India pg 234-237 - My 2nd WP:RS source JL Mehta's Advance Study in Indian History pg 237 clearly says quoting;
Thus nature did provide a golden opportunity to the Marathas to establish their sway over whole of Punjab and northwest India, upto Attock and Khyber pass, although the spell of their rule proved very shortlived.
This clearly indicates Maratha Empire/Confederacy ruled till Khyber Pass. - <meta />
- 3rd WP:RS source Pletcher, Kenneth (2010). The History of India pg 198 quoting;
Thus in 1757 Ahmad Shah's son Timur, appointed governor of Punjab, was forced to retreat from Lahore to Peshawar under the force of attacks from Sikhs and Marathas.
- 4th WP:RS Source;The state at war in South Asia page 55; quoting:
The Marathas attacked soon after and, with some help from the Sikhs, managed to capture Attock, Peshawar, and Multan between April and May 1758.
SEE the word "CAPTURED" - Additional: The Marathas New Cambridge History of India Vol2 Part 4 states This is for Areal limit of the Empire/Confederacy (same source); Quoting:
First, we shall look at the expanding areas controlled by the Marathas, and there were many. Maratha leaders pushed into Rajasthan, the area around Delhi, and on into the Punjab. They attacked Bundelkund and the borders of Uttar Pradesh. Further east, the Marathas attacked Orissa and the borders of Bengal and Bihar.
- And Same book pg 138 states; quoting; This is the source for protectors of Delhi throne pg 138 here is the quotation:
For the Marathas, probably the two most significant events of the whole chaotic period in Delhi were a treaty in 1752, which made them protector of the Mughal throne (and gave them the right to collect chauth in the Punjab), and the civil war of 1753, by which the Maratha nominee ended up on the Mughal throne.
Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please see WP:RS if necessary Rahio1234 11:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Multiple users are persistently disruptive the article, likely due to the new move talk consensus. PadFoot2008 12:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got the WP:RS Sources Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 12:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
FC Barcelona
Reason: This page keeps being vandalised by sockpuppets (even though the page is already semi-protected..). Several socks of the sockmaster (The Penfield Homunculus) have been banned during the last couple of months but the vandalism continues due to new socks emerging. Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 12:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- The vandalic edits are your's. Stop accusing others to sockpuppetry. First, demonstrate. Second, accuse. Mucchia (talk) 13:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- (Ironically) this message above was posted by one of their socks... Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 13:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed that Mucchia is one of the aforementioned socks. If it was feasible, I'd protect all the articles targeted by this prolific sockpuppeteer, but there's just too many. I'm leaving for a couple of days, otherwise I'd tackle this myself. I second Eem dik doun in toene's request for a more narrow protection. --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- (Ironically) this message above was posted by one of their socks... Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 13:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Francesca Amewudah-Rivers
Reason: Someone has obviously changed the first section either as a joke or maliciously. It is claiming that a British actress is descended from "predator" aliens. The rest of the article appears to be the original text. 81.78.117.74 (talk) 12:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
+1 Reason: Multiple instances of obvious vandalism by bigots. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 12:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
2024 Dominican Republic general election
Reason: Persistent addition of hoax content by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Binksternet
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Short-term protection requested after personal attack by Special:Contributions/2601:581:4500:A680:C1D6:95DD:6FE8:5DED who is User:Belsinfps editing logged-out. Binksternet (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Abu Bakr Salem
Reason: Over the past year since the last request, there have been several specific vandalism incidents that have had to be reverted over the nationality of the subject. Mehrashehra (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Pero Antić
Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 15:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Pink Friday 2 World Tour
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Gulab Chand Kataria
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 15:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Raphael Borges Rodrigues
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is attracting BLP vandals due to a recent trade. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
National Hockey League
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – None of the IP edits in the past week have been constructive. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 16:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Johnny Somali
Reason: I do not believe the protection of this page is needed because there isn't anyone hawk eyeing the article like before and there hasn't been any attempts to make changes on the talk page RowanJ LP (talk) 12:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- The user who protected the page is busterD. They should be responsible to handle this request.197.3.119.95 (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected Given the history of disruption at the page, the current protection level is appropriate. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
2014 Isla Vista killings
I would like to request that someone give this article a serious look through. There are numerous grammatical errors, as if someone who is not a native English speaker wrote it. Errors are primarily subject/verb agreement. 133.130.185.232 (talk) 01:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Bagna càuda
Repeated additions without valid sources; in any case there's a discussion on the discussion page, but Eduadoros seems not to have understood this. JacktheBrown (talk) 06:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – This page isn't currently protected. You might be looking for the dispute resolution process, though. Lectonar (talk) 08:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC) |
1 template-protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
AutopatrolledUser:Prince of Erebor
I have created 80 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor(The Book of Mazarbul) 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC) User:SheriffIsInTown
I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC) User:MinorProphet
Hi, I'd like to request Autopatrolled rights, please. A list of articles I created is here, and articles in various states of completion waiting in the wings are here. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) User:Eagledj
I have written 93 articles HERE, mostly music, biographies, golf, history, architecture, and people from Tennessee. I'd like to apply for auto patrolled status. I have done many BLPs including 5 GAs and I am familiar with the guidelines. Thank you.Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) User:Monhiroe
have created 80 articles and to create more in the future. Monhiroe (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC) User:KingEdinburgh
I regularly create military bio articles. KingEdinburgh (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) User:HagridLiving
Hello, I would like to request to become autopatrolled to simplify the process of creating pages about France and its heritage. HagridLiving (talk) 13:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowserUser:MallardTV
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rightsI feel that autowikibrowswer would be an incredibly useful tool in my Wikipedia editing. I have been an editor for several years now, and using this tool feels like a good next step. It would help me better contribute to this site. MallardTV (talk) 00:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Tiredmeliorist
I'm interested to try out AWB and see if it ups my wiki productivity (especially for pages I monitor or am actively editing). Thanks -Tiredmeliorist (talk) 21:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC) User:Slowking Man
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewerUser:Florificapis
I got busy in real life for most of March and April, so my request was put on hold per [2]. Here is my original reason for requesting NPR permissions again. I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. I know the guidelines on notability, proper sourcing, draftifying new articles, rating talk pages using scripts, AfC, AfD, and other essential patrolling tasks. Would be quite happy to reduce the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:InDimensional
I would like to participate in the NPP backlog drive.
User:TarnishedPath
I participated in the December backlog drive, being granted a trial. At the end of the trial I requested permanent NPP, which was denied with the denying admin expressing concern that I hadn't created any articles. I've since created an article about Neeraj Gupta (refer to User_talk:TarnishedPath/Archive_2#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Neeraj_Gupta_(sculptor)_has_been_accepted) and been responsible for the bulk of the material in the newly created article Bruce Lehrmann. I had been working on Draft:Bruce Lehrmann but someone else started work on Bruce Lehrmann just as I submitted Draft:Bruce Lehrmann to AfC so I ended up merging my work over to the mainspace article and issuing a CSD for deletion of the draft. I've continued to be semi-regularly involved with AfD. I'm applying because I got a notification a while ago that there was a backlog drive for May and I'm willing to help out a bit with that. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Trainsskyscrapers
Hello. I was initially given a month long trial as a new page reviewer after receiving an invitation on my user page, and I've been enjoying everything so far: reviewing pages, providing feedback, sending WikiLove to new and returning users who have made exceptional first attempts, tagging issues, and resolving issues myself (that could otherwise be tagged) when I have time in an attempt to reduce the backlog. I have already been renewed once, and my second trial expires in a little over two weeks (May 26th). I'm requesting either an indefinite or longer-term ability to review new pages before my time lapses. Haven't had any behavioral issues, and I try to treat all users with respect. I will continue to help clear the backlog in the meantime. Thanks again. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Ixtal
Forgot to re-apply before the permission ran out. Would like to continue participating in the drive as well as afterwards. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 06:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Aszx5000
I was turned down last July 2023 as being too early. I have since increased my article (incl. BLP) creation, and have done major overhaul and expansions of important topic articles here. I remain autopatrolled on Wikipedia and WikiCommons, continue to participate in AfD, and have done some PRODS. Am willing to learn the NPP process. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC) User:Rahammz
Hello. I had the new page reviewer permission but for some reason it was taken away without any explanation. I would like to apply for it again or at least get the reasoning for the removal of my permission Rahammz (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
User:The Sharpest Lives
I noticed there is a backlog at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, so I'd be happy to help! The Sharpest Lives (contribs) 16:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC) User:Pbritti
Hi! I was granted a one month trial with the NPP right and feel as though I did a decent job. I mainly focused on marking obviously acceptable articles. I didn't do a ton of reviewing, but I then again I felt like doing more than a handful a day would have been overstepping the constraints of a trial permission. If it is ok with the coordinating admins, I'd like to keep using the NPP right; feel welcome to simply renew the trial period for another month if you need more indication that I'll stick to procedure. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Xoak
I was suggested to apply here, and I've decided to volunteer. To make this more consistent: Thanks. User:Babegriev
Was hoping to contribute with working on the backlog here. I have rollback and have been working on RCP, but looking to expand my experience a bit. Not much to brag about with new article creation, but there's a limited sample there I stand behind. I'm decently acquainted with the AfD scene, and have been working with new (often problematic) users and editors as best I can from RCP. I was removed from probationary AFC due to inactivity, but I'm planning to be online more in the immediate future. Also have worked with copyvio patrol and have done the oddball GA review. Looking forward to help, and happy to discuss any questions. Thanks! Bgv. (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC) User:Tajotep
I always wanted to review new pages since I became familiar with Wikipedia and had a good behaviour. I also got motivated to post this request when I was granted to the autopatrolled user right without applying for it (an administrator decided it voluntarily). I'll check specially the last pages on "New Pages", which are at the end of the queue, to improve those articles and helping new users by telling the mistakes they have. Thanks in advance. Tajotep (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC) User:Melmann
Requesting either an extension or permanent permission, as my 1-month trial is due to expire within approximately 7 days. I've participated in the backlog drive, not as much as I had hoped to due to IRL commitments, but I've received no negative feedback so far and given the size of the backlog (despite the drive) it appears that help in this area is needed. |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page moverUser:Cremastra
Re-requesting after my one-month trial expired a month ago. I rename pages when it's necessary to make a round-robin swap, draftify new articles, and periodically close RMs. I also sometimes help in renaming categories for CfD. Cremastra (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) User:Lightoil
Hi I am requesting permanent page mover rights. I have been using my rights to help close Requested Moves and WP:RMTR and to the lessor extent draftifying pages. I have been more careful since the last time I requested the rights, doing the required cleanup after moves. I am asking for the renewal early as it took a long time for my rights to be renewed the last time. Thank you for your consideration. Lightoil (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
User:JarrahTree
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewerUser:RowanJ LP
I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC) User:RITWIK MAHATA
I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) User:Imsaneikigai
I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC) User:AnAlpineSymphony
I have read all the articles and tips for reviewing pending edits. I also have a large, significant history of editing many Engkish and Korean articles about Academics, Music theory, etc. AnAlpineSymphony (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC) User:AlphaBetaGamma
I've done reverting vandalism (Although I was on a hiatus since Golden Week as the vandal level hit 5) for some months now, with my edits growing over 2000 from 89ish including other works, and I request this permission to help with the works. I understand that I did make a misunderstandment couple of weeks ago and I have revised the guidelines to prevent another instance of that happening. (I've been making sure not to miss placing a uw as well). Not planning to request rollbacker until I stop making accidents. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC) User:750h+
I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Boneless Pizza!
I have watched listed several article that have been protected as "pending changes" such as Charizard and Woody (Toy Story) and I would love to have an option to accept their edits if its constructive. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) User:Jonathanischoice
I've been editing Wikipedia since 2004 and have been mainly working on articles about New Zealand, musical instruments, and wine. I've helped build several articles up to GA (cimbasso, serpent, contrabass trombone, soprano trombone) and reviewed several others. It would be good to be able to approve pending useful contributions to protected articles; the current article that prompted this request is the trombone article, which I'd also like to work on. Jon (talk) 02:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Demetrios1993
I have been editing the English Wikipedia for about five years now, and have made approximately 7,300 edits. I am an active user, and currently monitor around 1400 pages. I also have a good understanding of the relevant policies and the guideline on reviewing; per the criteria to receive this permission. Demetrios1993 (talk) 02:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
RollbackUser:BerryForPerpetuity
I'm applying for rollback rights in order to help with my current recent changes patrolling. With rollback rights, I will gain access to more advanced counter-vandalism tools like AntiVandal and Huggle. I have been patrolling for about a month and made plenty of AIV reports (all of which were successful). BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 12:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
User:DANGA14
I patrol a lot at RC, have made 216 edits, constantly warns users of vandalism, does not edit war. I'm not part of the CVU, but i revert vandalism quite a lot. DANGA14talk 12:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
User:HirowoWiki
I've been active at recent changes for more than 3 months to help revert vandalism and report AIV, which is successful. Rollback rights need access to a counter-vandalism tool. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 01:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editorUser:Sundostund
Hello. I am re-applying for template editor rights, which I was granted on a temporary basis by Primefac (permalink) on 24 February; it is about to expire at 00:00, on 24 May. As I promised in my original request back in February, and as can be seen, I didn't misuse this right in any way. I used it in a very responsible manner, on a periodical basis, and I'm no longer obliged to bother others with template-protected edit requests, and basically have them to do my work for me when it comes to HRTs. Naturally, I would prefer if this right is extended on a permanent basis, but that is up to admins to decide. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
User:NaomiAmethyst
There are a number of highly visible protected templates inside my bots' userspace that I'd like to be able to modify again now that I am no longer an admin: |